Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:20:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, kc5vdj@yahoo.com, kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010824212042.A86744@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010824231053.U88304@futuresouth.com>; from fullermd@futuresouth.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:10:53PM -0500 References: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com> <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com> <20010824094600W.jkh@freebsd.org> <20010824231053.U88304@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > So yes, there's a difference. But, on the flip side, I think that > the fact that it's been this long without anybody screaming majorly > (after the initial shakedown, of course) kinda sums it up. There are differences in defaults, yes, but are there differences which can't be fixed by setting options? That's what's being asked. Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7hyeZWry0BWjoQKURAgUZAJ4pdR3zRefMMKictkCswh6sc+pi5gCgqN44 +kwCBCx/gTb3BZpcHnljA84= =Vkkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824212042.A86744>