Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:40:59 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sysinstall, GJOURNAL and ZFS Message-ID: <4A2FB7EB.30007@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906101511110.16752@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906091632430.6551@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <cf9b1ee00906090757v7d589dfch978076a97be724a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090609172142.GA92146@ebi.local> <20090609.195750.41709103.sthaug@nethelp.no> <86hbyowgj6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906101428591.49870@woozle.rinet.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906101346040.16323@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <cf9b1ee00906100504p31de4d4dj1ddd4c54b95f95de@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906101511110.16752@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> during installation process as well gives these newer options >> (UFS2+GJournal and ZFS in this case) a better exposure, resulting in >> more testing, resulting in these new features getting their quirks >> ironed out faster and resulting in these new features getting the >> "truly tested and proven by time" stamp of approval faster. I think we >> can all agree this would be a good thing? > > so fix sysinstall and do sent-pr. goto first post & read it again.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A2FB7EB.30007>