Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Mar 2002 23:35:30 +0100 (MET)
From:      Mark Huizer <xaa@dohd.org>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   kern/36240: new IPFilter works for IPv6 - no hooks in rc.*
Message-ID:  <20020323223530.B9584D908@nala.dohd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         36240
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       new IPFilter works for IPv6 - no hooks in rc.*
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Mar 23 14:40:02 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Mark Huizer
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD eeyore.local.dohd.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Sat Mar 23 17:57:04 MET 2002 xaa@eeyore.local.dohd.org:/sources/obj/sources/src/sys/eeyore i386


	Current as of saturday March-23
>Description:
	The new IPFilter upgrade finally has decent working filtering
	for IPv6, which combined with a default of blocking, means that
	no IPv6 traffic is possible.
	The rc* scripts have no hooks to load /etc/ipf.rules6 or
	something similar
>How-To-Repeat:
	use IPFILTER and IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK, and try to make IPv6
	work :-)
>Fix:

	/etc/rc.network should have hooks for IPv6 (or there should be
	a ipfilter_enable6, which does a ipf -6 -f $ipfilter_file6 or
	something)

	No patches yet. I'm not sure if this should go in rc.network
	(where all the filtering is done) or rc.network6
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020323223530.B9584D908>