Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:58:57 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/portaudit-db/database portaudit.txt portaudit.xlist portaudit.xml Message-ID: <7misbhdfxa.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <730CE1BB-EFA2-11D8-924A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040816145901.GB5482@lum.celabo.org> <730CE1BB-EFA2-11D8-924A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey, can both of you do constructive discussion rather than picking
past conflicts?
At Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:36:40 +0200,
Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> > What are you trying to accomplish, Oliver? I would really like to know
> > because clearly this situation is not good for our community.
>
> A correctly working port auditing system, where users are timely warned
> of possible vulnerabilities in their installed software. While it might
> be acceptable when a documentation sometimes leaves out a PORTEPOCH or
> has false positives for a couple of days, I consider this highly
> problematic for portaudit and try to fix these things ASAP.
Both of you are providing good tools for port auditing. Please don't
blame someone who did breakage. Let's fix and go ahead.
I think you can do emergency fix to security/vuxml/vuln.xml if Jacques
cannot reply smoothly. But posting a patch to freebsd-vuxml@ highly
desirable.
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7misbhdfxa.wl>