Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 May 2001 18:45:28 +0100
From:      Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To:        Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: -R for make update ?
Message-ID:  <20010521184527.C840@tao.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20010521194828.A789@freebie.demon.nl>; from wkb@freebie.demon.nl on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:48:28PM %2B0200
References:  <20010521194828.A789@freebie.demon.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:48:28PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Hi=20
>=20
> Is there any specific reason why one needs to be able to write a lock to =
the
> CVS repo when running 'make update' to get a freshly checked out source?=
=20
> The Makefile.inc1 has:
>=20
> .if defined(CVS_UPDATE)
>         @echo
> 	"--------------------------------------------------------------"
> 	@echo ">>> Updating ${.CURDIR} from cvs repository" ${CVSROOT}
> 	@echo
> 	"--------------------------------------------------------------"
> 	cd ${.CURDIR}; cvs -q update -A -P -d
> .endif
>=20
> In other words, would adding '-R' hurt?

I don't see why it should.

Joe

--Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsJVDcACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbTuACbBFTUaaa42kgW1Uy6de6db+B+
JoIAn12i9vsm2MjQ6q0LPFNRHAVGEwRN
=poa8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010521184527.C840>