Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:12:31 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Michael_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, bf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OCaml 4? Message-ID: <527CD52F.7000208@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwOJfKt5pYxgR1rt3czx=vYd09=o0gtv8DJUszESn9Ye4Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <830ACA3E-9233-453F-A891-2EA0F0B9F2DB@felyko.com> <527A9A9B.2040202@laposte.net> <527A9BB8.5010401@marino.st> <527AA045.7000302@laposte.net> <527AA687.9080405@marino.st> <527B2DFA.1060406@laposte.net> <527B4745.5070904@marino.st> <527BD0D6.50205@laposte.net> <CAGFTUwOJfKt5pYxgR1rt3czx=vYd09=o0gtv8DJUszESn9Ye4Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/8/2013 12:58, Brendan Fabeny wrote: > On 11/7/13, Michael Grünewald <michael.grunewald@laposte.net> wrote: >> John Marino wrote: >> >>> I was thinking the holdup was on your end,[…] >>> Has the whole thing stalled? 11 months to get a PR through when the >>> submitter is responsive seems excessive to me, maybe somebody else >>> should take over the PR if bf@ is too busy. >> >> It looks like it is stalled. It would actually nice if someone else >> would take care of that PR[1] but before this, I certainly need to take >> care of removing this NO_STAGE flag. It is probably unproblematic, I >> did not study this staging functionality yet. Frankly, I think it's way more important to get OCAML updated than support staging. If the PR you have is good sans staging, then I'd propose to commit that ASAP, and a new PR could be opened to add stage support. (in order words, the last of stage support should not block the maintenance of an existing port) John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?527CD52F.7000208>