Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Mar 2019 19:16:20 -0500
From:      Greg Veldman <freebsd@gregv.net>
To:        Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-office@freebsd.org, Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>, Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [call for help] libreoffice 6.2 update
Message-ID:  <20190309001620.GM98884@aurora.gregv.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKBkRUze9ML3R_KJnEjktReO4vFuTKHhwqArpcx6VXJOG3u4tg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAKBkRUwohGA4Lka-tpCZnj7rt2V=henc%2B0b==HtLxP-WLXeLJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKBkRUyeYa4V8op6FS-mPqUUMXgwQ3mLze0WFFf3z2Z-_KNiBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKBkRUyD3hXOdfMdNfU78CPUYWOEJT3TfUTm3OW_9JDHhs=Ebw@mail.gmail.com> <20190218144218.GA98237@aurora.gregv.net> <20190218150917.GB98237@aurora.gregv.net> <CAKBkRUztkbJJTHe2B24MmCpcVeeR83%2Bi9Y6pUUhDO-P8bgOomw@mail.gmail.com> <20190219170520.GC98237@aurora.gregv.net> <CAKBkRUze9ML3R_KJnEjktReO4vFuTKHhwqArpcx6VXJOG3u4tg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:38:28PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> - Now libreoffice doesn't build on i386 systems:
> 
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-6.2.1.1/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:167:32:
> error: unknown type name '__si_class_type_info'
>                     rtti = new __si_class_type_info(
>                                ^
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-6.2.1.1/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:173:32:
> error: unknown type name '__class_type_info'
>                     rtti = new __class_type_info( strdup( rttiName ) );
>                                ^
> 2 errors generated.
> 
> It seems because we removed the two
> patch-bridges_source_cpp__uno_gcc3__linux__intel_* files, but
> currently I don't know why this affect 32-bit systems. The full error
> log is available at:
> https://gist.github.com/lwhsu/957db6755bacc2ee086b2fae513e5406

Yes, it appears to be down to the fact the LLVM does RTTI a
bit differently.  Looking into it now.  If I have to bring those
patches forward, I will but I'll try to give them a bit more
descriptive names/comments.  But if there's a cleaner way (less
local patches) that would be my first choice.

-- 
Greg Veldman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190309001620.GM98884>