Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 May 2007 04:33:19 +0000
From:      Darren Reed <darrenr@hub.freebsd.org>
To:        "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c
Message-ID:  <20070501043319.GA29539@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704241142.l3OBggmW065495@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200704241142.l3OBggmW065495@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:42:42AM +0000, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> gnn         2007-04-24 11:42:42 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_6)
>     sys/netinet6         in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c 
>   Log:
>   Add a new sysctl net.inet.ip6.rthdr0_allowed, which is default off,
>   to disable the processing of Route Header Type 0 options in IPv6.
>   This is not really an MFC because currently in HEAD the processing
>   of these options is disabled unilateraly pending discussion at the IETF
>   on the future of such headers.

Given this direction came from the IETF, is there an internet draft
or RFC or BCP that discusses or summarises this?

Darren



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070501043319.GA29539>