Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:00:59 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS. Message-ID: <419667FB.1090103@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <41965358.7090100@gmx.net> References: <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net> <20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au> <20041113135821.GD70256@voodoo.oberon.net> <200411131001.08820.kstewart@owt.com> <41965358.7090100@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Also sysutils/portsnap is an alternative for updating ports trees which
> shouldn't be affected by the deletion of the indices from CVS either.
Okay, forget about that, portsnap doesn't actually provide indices. My mistake.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419667FB.1090103>