Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 22:23:10 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h uthread_yield.c Message-ID: <199803080523.WAA06336@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199803080318.OAA10520@cimlogic.com.au> References: <199803080301.TAA08108@dingo.cdrom.com> <199803080318.OAA10520@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> that it will all just come out in the wash. Kernel threads aren't > light weight, though. If kernel threads aren't light-weight, then what differentiates them from processes? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803080523.WAA06336>