Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 May 2007 10:59:00 -0700
From:      "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        "Andre Oppermann" <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: EM and TSO
Message-ID:  <2a41acea0705161059g1537c780w500968a82e5fe4f2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <464B4103.4020505@freebsd.org>
References:  <2a41acea0705161030k40831aa5o168b5bc40fcf3352@mail.gmail.com> <464B4103.4020505@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote:
> > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express
> > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and
> > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll
> > everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without
> > problems and wish to keep the support in?
>
> I'm using the dual-port PCI-X adapter and would like to keep
> using TSO on it.  There are a lot of those adapters out there
> in servers.  TSO is scheduled to be MFC'd really soon now and
> not having it work with em(4) on PCI-X would be quite limiting.

OK, I'll put it back, you also answered a question I had, namely
the MFC of TSO :) I was hoping that got into 6.3.

I have another bug I'm working on, will be a delta today or tomorrow
and I'll put it back to what it was.

Jack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0705161059g1537c780w500968a82e5fe4f2>