Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "types" man page Message-ID: <XFMail.011024111143.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpadyhylgl.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> On 24-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> > Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> writes: >> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:43:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> > > > 2) in what section would such a man page belong? >> > > 7 or 9? >> > It's definitely not kernel-only, so I don't think 9 is appropriate; 7 >> > would be a last resort if we can't think of anything better. >> 7 is good to me it seems. See operator(7), ascii(7), etc. > > Right. What do we do with types(5)? Leave it alone, nuke it, or > repo-copy it to types(7)? (I don't see much point in the latter as > there would be very little in common between the two) > > Ruslan, do you have a suggestion for the proper mdoc incantations for > a types(7) entry, based on the items I listed in my original mail? Nuke types(5). Your proposed types(7) will be much more useful, IMO. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011024111143.jhb>