Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:22:50 -0400 From: "MikeM" <the.lists@mgm51.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? Message-ID: <200506191122500702.00A479A6@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <42B46EF0.1080406@dial.pipex.com> References: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> <42B46EF0.1080406@dial.pipex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/18/2005 at 7:58 PM Alex Zbyslaw wrote: |Kirk Strauser wrote: | |>My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and |>isn't hampered by bizarre licensing and enormous egos. |> |> |Active development has to be the killer argument. Who wants to |rely on software that no-one cares enough about to develop |properly? ============= Another reason in favor of Postfix -- the Postfix user support mailing list is excellent. qmail support mailing list is less than helpful. http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506191122500702.00A479A6>