Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:45:20 +0000 From: "imp (Warner Losh)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D2340: Support for Alpine platform from Annapurna Labs Message-ID: <ce61cfd60d177ac30a91f6671e4f9262@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-gclxe3zq7xamd5hpjagv-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-gclxe3zq7xamd5hpjagv-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
imp added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2340#46897, @jpa-semihalf.com wrote: > Thank you for discussion and suggestions. This revision fixes reported style + a bit more. > As for the discussion topics, a roadmap with regard to mentioned issues looks like this: > > 1. delivery the platform support as is - this is a coherent change in terms of platform and hal > 2. the next planned code drop involves msix support so relates to pci enhancement and cleanup. At this stage I will deal with dts compatibility - this will let me parallelise some works. > 3. meanwhile, I will move the hal to sys/contrib. This shall be a painless transition and will prelude another hal drop in for eth driver Does it sound reasonable? Sounds reasonable to me. Andy's idea of splitting out PCI changes might help us with some of the Phabricator issues we've seen on other large reviews. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2340 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: jpa-semihalf.com, andrew, ian, imp Cc: emaste, meloun-miracle-cz, onwahe-gmail-com, freebsd-arm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ce61cfd60d177ac30a91f6671e4f9262>