Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:18:01 -0800
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Please test: new ACPI release (20041105) import
Message-ID:  <419A8AA9.3070808@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041116190803.GC736@laptop.6bone.nl>
References:  <20041115211636.GA1540@laptop.6bone.nl> <3183.213.147.173.194.1100622599.squirrel@mail.webonaut.com> <20041116190803.GC736@laptop.6bone.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:29:59PM +0100, Franz Klammer wrote:
>>does this patch also work with 5.3 or only with -CURRENT?
> 
> It probably wouldn't be too hard to get it to work for 5.3 in case of
> this particular patch.
> 
> In general I don't know yet what the policy will be regarding 5-STABLE
> and ACPI.

My current understanding of how things should work in RELENG_5 is that 
ACPI-CA imports will be tested in 6-current for a minimum of 1 week. 
Patches will be posted to freebsd-acpi@ for about 5 days before an 
import to 6-current.  Changes, additions, etc. to acpi in general can be 
committed to 6-current immediately if not too drastic and MFCd after 2 
days to 1 week.  I intend for RELENG_5 to never diverge from 6-current 
unless required by external API changes.  If minimal, we'll ifdef around 
the interface changes with __FreeBSD_version__.

Hope that answers the question.

-- 
Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419A8AA9.3070808>