Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:47:25 +0100 From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <tonix@interazioni.it> To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: camcontrol and IDAD0 Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.0.20050909214532.053cd8b0@pop.ufficiopostale.it> In-Reply-To: <20050909135705.O84118@sasami.jurai.net> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20050901172618.0532ecb0@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <20050906084747.A84118@sasami.jurai.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20050907153854.04c36bc8@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <6.2.3.4.0.20050907163520.05554a30@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <6.2.3.4.0.20050907164953.0548c070@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <20050907133856.C84118@sasami.jurai.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20050909120032.053cc160@pop.ufficiopostale.it> <20050909135705.O84118@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 18.58 09/09/2005, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: >On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: >>Finally, these controllers seems to be unusable in a production >>environment with FreeBSD. > >I don't think anyone has really tested rebuilding a volume while the >system is running. > >I'd be interested in the results of changing the definition of >IDA_QCB_MAX from 256 to 128. > >See sys/dev/ida/idavar.h: > > #define IDA_QCB_MAX 256 Great! You will be happy to know that the same small test suite that always hang up before, with this "128" value has never hang! On Monday I'll do heavier tests. Do you want me to try other? Thanks, Tonino >-- >10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.0.20050909214532.053cd8b0>