Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:07:10 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: kernel thread as real threads.. Message-ID: <43D142EE.9080601@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201443570.1773-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or >>> kernel visible way? Is this something that is really all that >>> important? >> >> >> >> Only in a non-portable way. See pthread_set_name_np(3). >> > > Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically > name kthreads and use the process name for user threads. that's what happens with my patches already.. > > Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D142EE.9080601>