Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 20:56:02 -0200 From: William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com> To: Nicola Vitale <nivit@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Veniamin Gvozdikov <vg@freebsd.org>, Marcus von Appen <mva@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r332287 - in head/sysutils: . py-halite py-halite/files Message-ID: <CAHtVNLPkhucEXm6Pht8FcZmrazYDRYj_ZJyg_6r_hmA=bq6vqg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEQKd7Wf-6jYqvn13tC2OmKem4m%2BdA5xcCAq_t-QauvR20gYAQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201310312121.r9VLLp4d066004@svn.freebsd.org> <20131031214346.GA1402@medusa.sysfault.org> <CAHtVNLOfy8yUEJSDpzR=dT-DSo=QdvEd474uvesPphL1PeMzHg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEQKd7UCWxPaFT0fmBs=-wukzW7WHaswF2wiZz3uuWAJxsHe=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHtVNLOTs7t9PPLsE1AOz1EC0i1vs1BWpchNunBqCirqv0EWCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEQKd7W7bMYa%2B=QsDj42QGFBjwN1HzxHs4F7a=AwGJyZKuY4mg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHtVNLOQbKb9DhTT3nOLBvcSWitC7aikKq4z%2BdQBgTHt4Keo4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAEQKd7VgzaVj74HDGQrFzkbtu==KfeA_6iO0eUszjTF4_Ys0BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHtVNLNDAFbvjwY_ywTTFjg6PM9pbGiGKWBoFCmmCRiZgobqzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEQKd7XfjPN6Q6J=iSw=By-t1XW_REy5T%2Bcs82Y0GccaskSRUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHtVNLPCF2r61vseb4_BoKJ92HgC=4VgY0xbrx0b%2BDDk8EQJWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEQKd7Wf-6jYqvn13tC2OmKem4m%2BdA5xcCAq_t-QauvR20gYAQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Nicola Vitale <nivit@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > >> [2013/11/3 William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com>] >>I think I found a few issues, the compileall should be >> only for easy_install > > LOL, that was my last-minute change, without any tests, because it > seemed to me more beatifull and safe there. :D > >> the place for dirrmtry is in the autoplist and should be @unexec instead. > > You are right, thanks. > >> Here is another iteration, let me know what you think: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~wg/easyinstall-stage-v3.txt > > It works fine with my set of test ports. > Anyway, I think both patches need an in-depth test, before committing, > but they are a good starting point. :) I think I'll ask portmgr@ an exp-run for this change, but I think it is working fine, I tested for all kind of ports, with and without easy_install and with and without stage. Thanks for the help! -- William Grzybowski ------------------------------------------ Curitiba/PR - Brasil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHtVNLPkhucEXm6Pht8FcZmrazYDRYj_ZJyg_6r_hmA=bq6vqg>