Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:29:27 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files Message-ID: <CADLo839uwhSGLtit16oOOmSibN3G%2B7GL2CEb7kBD9J_AvUSfyg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> wrote: > > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > > > WITH_KMS=YES > > WITH_KMS="YES" > > WITH_KMS=yes > > With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. > > In general, from my experience, only the second one will work. > > This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is > pretty picky about this. All three are fine in make.conf and rc.conf The issue with rc.conf is when people put spaces around the = sign. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839uwhSGLtit16oOOmSibN3G%2B7GL2CEb7kBD9J_AvUSfyg>