Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:35:17 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFR: fseek<0 + feof error (with fix) Message-ID: <20010811013517.B16759@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200108102132.f7ALWqg37835@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20010810232939.A14964@nagual.pp.ru> <20010810234922.A15324@nagual.pp.ru> <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010811010820.A16395@nagual.pp.ru> <200108102132.f7ALWqg37835@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 17:32:52 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:08:22 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> said: > > > As it says, "the resulting file offset would be a value which cannot be > > represented correctly" and it cannot be, because range overflow occurse in > > the calculation process, not given directly in arguments, as for EINVAL. > > I do not think your interpretation reflects the intent of the text. I agree at this point. See my answer message. > Perhaps this question should be raised on the Austin Group list. Why? EINVAL description is quite clear. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010811013517.B16759>