Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:27:46 -0500 From: Kyle Evans <self@kyle-evans.net> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] less patches: control the PATH Message-ID: <CACNAnaGLTH5YYz%2BDGcK4jjHZKe2MPHVudypD30mGCJ6cUk37-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42d09435-072d-d196-1822-bb5c603b49af@madpilot.net> References: <20171006131146.qswg2barkhelii4n@ivaldir.net> <42d09435-072d-d196-1822-bb5c603b49af@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 6, 2017 8:24 AM, "Guido Falsi" <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: On 10/06/2017 15:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a patch to add a new feature I am willing to get for a while: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12603 > A user can control which binary will be found in the PATH of the build sequences > easily by adding > BINARY_RENAME= source target > PS2: the BINARY_RENAME variable name sucks, any better name is welcome :) > Suggestions from the top of my head: BINARY_ALIAS PROGRAM_ALIAS EXECUTABLE_ALIAS COMMAND_ALIAS (Yes I think "alias" expresses the concept better) -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> +1 for BINARY_ALIAS; concise, descriptive, and accurate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaGLTH5YYz%2BDGcK4jjHZKe2MPHVudypD30mGCJ6cUk37-Q>