Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:07:12 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Showstoppers for RPI3 Message-ID: <e7ca78ce3e244746da86b41b608d0fa194521dd7.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20200226164559.GA82128@www.zefox.net> References: <20200225175446.GA77976@www.zefox.net> <11951E01-EC13-4FBB-938A-AEB5700C4281@yahoo.com> <CACNAnaEiv5NZZz%2BxfETkhSZ-zbjZ3Ya6z7pyteheP4zj3EK1Gg@mail.gmail.com> <20200226052045.GA79939@www.zefox.net> <E866B6BE-7948-4412-82EF-999A2F8C0DF9@googlemail.com> <04e8e290e5d7bb810f76ece4ff33d6e1006e63cd.camel@freebsd.org> <20200226164559.GA82128@www.zefox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 08:45 -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:33:24AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > If you want to run freebsd on arm hardware, try using hardware that > > people are actually working to support. If you must use crappy rpi > > hardware, either run linux on it, or consider paying someone to do > > the > > freebsd support you need. > > How much money is involved? Personally I can't afford to hire > somebody, > but earmarked contributiions to the FreeBSD Foundation are feasible. > > What would be required to attract useful attention? > > Thanks for writing! > > bob prohaska I don't think earmarked contributions are allowed, at least not something earmarked to a specific task or piece of work (as opposed to something generic like "use these funds for advocacy"). If they were allowed, a company could effectively use an earmarked contribution as a way of hiring a contractor to write code, while writing off the money paid to her as a charitable contribution to the foundation. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e7ca78ce3e244746da86b41b608d0fa194521dd7.camel>