Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:25:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Eduardo Morras <nec556@retena.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207171124550.26877@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FA882720124B385@> (added by postmaster@resmaa13.ono.com) References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF4BEED.10103@FreeBSD.org> <62039A45-92E4-4588-988D-6DF39D7B01E5@bsdimp.com> <201207050922.25815.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20120705082857.GB37083@server.rulingia.com> <4FF55864.8040807@FreeBSD.org> <4FF5BE93.4010509@my.gd> <20120705170944.GA43725@DataIX.net> <20120705131518.06898223@bhuda.mired.org> <4FA882720124B385@> (added by postmaster@resmaa13.ono.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> the behavior of shells is an even worse idea than turning this nanny >> behavior on for everyone. > > Add sysctl for apps is a no-no, sysctl is for system control, not userland still this stupid idea topics continue? Is FreeBSD finally intended to be unix implementation or feature war with linux/windows? STOP IT.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207171124550.26877>