Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Harti Brandt <harti@FreeBSD.org>, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:47:08 -0700") References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes: > I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't > trigger it. The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier, the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts performance as well. (what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than 100%) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fyn242w0.fsf>