Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Jan 1998 01:08:51 GMT
From:      jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly)
To:        Diana <deichert@wrench.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [fbsd-isp] Designing for a very large ISP
Message-ID:  <34b13225.1596230@mail.cetlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980104151830.24452A-100000@ts.shopnet.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.980104151830.24452A-100000@ts.shopnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998 15:35:40 -0700 (MST), Diana <deichert@wrench.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, John Kelly wrote:
>
>> >> I'm doing some simple testing to see if FreeBSD is feasible as a
>> >> terminal server.  My first test of 2.2.5-stable, using only two ports
>> >> simultaneously, indicates there is considerable  efficiency loss due
>> >> to transmit underruns.  Next I'm going back to 2.2.2-release which
>> >> reputedly performed better, and I'll try the same test on a different
>> >> box to rule out hardware contributing to the problem.
>
>Are you using the standard ISA serial ports for your test?

An 8-port multiport serial card from Byterunner.  But after further
testing, the problem appears to be related to NATD, not SIO.  I just
posted another message with more detail.

John






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34b13225.1596230>