Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:56:27 +0000
From:      Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        glarkin@freebsd.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: editing a binary file
Message-ID:  <20091218165627.GB89667@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912180904180.11293@lightning.wonkity.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912180904180.11293@lightning.wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:33:49AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > Greg Larkin <glarkin@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > truncate -4 myfile should get rid of the last four bytes.  Maybe
> > > > there's a similar efficient way to truncate the start of a file.
> > >
> > > This should do it:
> > >
> > > dd if=oldfile of=newfile bs=1 skip=4
> > 
> > Or, perhaps marginally more efficient:
> > 
> > dd if=oldfile of=newfile bs=4 skip=1
> 
> It would be nice to avoid the file copy, but maybe there's no way to do 
> that.  The small buffer size for dd will probably make copies of 
> multi-gig files slow.  This might be faster:
> 
> tail -c +5 myfile > outfile
> truncate -4 outfile
> 
> (Has anyone mentioned that you can edit binary files interactively with 
> vi yet?  No?  Well, it's horrific and surely has interesting failure 
> modes.  And there are probably disadvantages also.)

Vim, yes. I tried, but failed. At the moment dd/truncate combination
seems the most appealing. But I'll look at C/perl/python proposed
solutions as well.

many thanks

-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091218165627.GB89667>