Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:16:16 -0700 (MST)
From:      Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com>
To:        Ben WIlliams <williamsl@Home.Com>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: divert rules
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9912081015260.41144-100000@rapidnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <10444.991208@Home.Com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Ben WIlliams wrote:

[snip]
> However when playing with divert rules on my natd box whenever I had
> more than one divert rule -each- rule would be triggered. The effect
> this had was to have multiple replies sent to any request the inside
> boxes made. Is this the expected behaviour? (Doesn't seem that way to
> me...) The divert rules were all together if that has anything to do
> with it. 

	What do your firewall rules look like?

********************************************************
Nick Rogness		       File not found...
System Administrator	       Should I fake it (Y/N)?
RapidNet, INC   	       
********************************************************




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9912081015260.41144-100000>