Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:06:53 +0100 From: clay@milos.co.za To: Matt Smith <matt@xtaz.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 RELENG_9 Unable to cleanly dismount root partition on shutdown Message-ID: <12a12894ae0617e5782093c6ce4139e3@milos.co.za> In-Reply-To: <db69acbf6dac31944e596aa71dceeb28@xtaz.co.uk> References: <2d4dfcb2637f4d0e9671899538b603d9@xtaz.co.uk> <c5b9717a35dcb292a8aaca111d695ca1@milos.co.za> <db69acbf6dac31944e596aa71dceeb28@xtaz.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27.08.2012 11:15, Matt Smith wrote: > On 2012-08-27 10:25, clay@milos.co.za wrote: >> I'm far from anything near an expert on file systems but I'd suggest >> you remove softupdates and leave journaling on. >> tunefs -n disable >> There's no need to have both on and although I agree that both >> SHOULD >> work together there's no reason to have them on together. It will >> only >> slow down writes to the file system. Effectively soft updates was a >> go-between before journalin was introduced. >> > > Really? This is SU+J journalling that I'm using. Not gjournal. Surely > SU+J does require softupdates to be on as it's part of the same > thing? > Output from tunefs -p: > > tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled > tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j) enabled > tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled I saw that you had soft updates and soft updates journaling in your original email. What you have is correct. That is how 9.x sets up the FS by default nowadays.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12a12894ae0617e5782093c6ce4139e3>