Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:43:20 -0500
From:      Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: update - better EDMA RX support, testing AR9580
Message-ID:  <514A73C8.7050102@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=MZXU3qdOHmv99Hq-XRZCCphw-O_M8Tv=T7srE=apq%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=UZDCb%2BeSRLO5fiJQNJkzVYqjcy4zWNc70CBePQyKGjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=MZXU3qdOHmv99Hq-XRZCCphw-O_M8Tv=T7srE=apq%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/19/2013 10:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 March 2013 12:39, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just committed some new RX handling code. Since the RX FIFO on
>> the AR9380 and later chips is very shallow (128 entries), you have to
>> refill the FIFO much quicker than you can handle frames.
>
> .. and an AR9390 STA -> AR9380 AP at MCS24 is giving me around 230mbit TCP.
>
> My goal is to hit 200mbit TCP on 2x2 and 300mbit TCP on 3x3.
>
> But, I won't complain about getting to 230mbit this early in the game.
>
>
>
> Adrian

Any tips for backporting the code to -STABLE?  Currently I had to 
comment out the scsi cd driver because it was causing kernel panics. 
Now I'm getting kernel panics from geom_io.c due to a failed assert.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?514A73C8.7050102>