Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:18:57 -0700
From:      Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org>
To:        sheldonh@starjuice.net
Cc:        brian@Awfulhak.org, joshua@roughtrade.net, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, brian@freebsd-services.com
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf 
Message-ID:  <20010829091857E.jkh@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <76231.999089667@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
References:  <200108291247.f7TClGf75486@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <76231.999089667@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why is everyone still debating this?  I already turned it down for
an MFC weeks ago. :|

- Jordan

From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf 
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:54:27 +0200

> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:47:16 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> 
> > The point is that /usr/src/etc/defaults/rc.conf *will* be blindly 
> > installed on top of /etc/defaults/rc.conf.  People's configuration 
> > *will* break because of this.  An UPDATING entry *is* required to 
> > let people know.
> 
> Who's configurations, Brian?
> 
> So far, my understanding is that it's the configurations of folks who
> run their own caching name resolver on ad hoc dial-up hosts.  Is that
> correct?
> 
> If so, then you're holding back a really great improvement to FreeBSD to
> protect a really small group of people, most of whom probably have a
> clue.
> 
> Ciao,
> Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010829091857E.jkh>