Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Dec 1996 08:40:32 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
To:        George Michaelson <ggm@connect.com.au>
Cc:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: siguing into current from a random version 
Message-ID:  <15523.850117232@critter.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Dec 1996 11:09:03 %2B1000." <15134.850093743@connect.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <15134.850093743@connect.com.au>, George Michaelson writes:
>
>Snaps are good but the timelag between snaps and interesting state in current
>is bad. If you're saying that for any given SUP state you can go from the
>last snap to current without tripping over any non-reversable states, well
>and good.  I don't think you're saying that :-)

Well, the snaps are supposed to happen about every other month or so...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@tfs.com           TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15523.850117232>