Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 17:12:29 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: velocidade da luz <assembler914@outlook.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Obscure operating systems Message-ID: <20140507171229.db3c658f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <COL128-W86FA85E5E7929B41D18E15904E0@phx.gbl> References: <COL128-W86FA85E5E7929B41D18E15904E0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 May 2014 15:49:22 +0300, velocidade da luz wrote: > Anyone here using PC-BSD, Yes. It's a great OS for beginners, and the german language support (important here in Germany) is acceptable. It runs on most hardware I've tried it, and it runs sufficiently fast. Still I would not use it as my desktop system because my individual preferences do not align with the project goals. :-) > PureDarwin, No. > GhostBSD, No. > AnonymOS, Not yet. > (Amnesiac) Incognito, Not yet. > eComStation, No, I prefer real OS/2. :-) There are only a few legacy applications I use at very few occassions, that's why I still have a OS/2 Warp 3 installation on real hardware here. eComStation is said to be a good successor, but as far as I know, it costs. For just "trial and error" too much, especially because I have already paid for OS/2. :-) > Syllable , No. > ReactOS, No. > Haiku, Yes, have been using it (as well as BeOS). It's especially interesting for devices with limited hardware. > or MenuetOS? No. > I'm planning on trying these, and would like to hear of users' > experiences (good or bad). Thanks. Try those, it will definitely be interesting. Probably you can use virtualisation to run most of them. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140507171229.db3c658f.freebsd>