Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ack! SYSTEMTYPE=WIN32 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310020640530.44406-100000@s1.stradamotorsports.com> In-Reply-To: <20031001120445.1aaf62c4.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Stephen Hilton wrote: > Jason, > > Seems like I fell for this at some point or another :) > > Do you actually use kerberised telnet with ROT_13 as the > encryption for the telnet session after authentication ? > > Is such a combination possible (not in theory :) I don't know that MIT Kerberos has such an encryption type. It does have encryption types that it warns against using. No. I do not use ROT_13 to encrypt my telnet sessions. Congratulations to Dag-Erling who's powers of observation snuffed me out. I never expected anyone to bite on my little ruse, but once someone did I decided it was OK to have a little fun with it by playing dumb. Later, Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0310020640530.44406-100000>