Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 07:59:05 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>, Chris Piazza <cpiazza@jaxon.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FYI: Missing DISTNAME for netpbm 8.4... Message-ID: <20000502075905.E392@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <vqcya5tbbjp.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:28:58AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005011709050.42183-100000@illiad.adhesivemedia.com> <vqcya5tbbjp.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:28:58AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > I've thought about adding some sort of "timeout" in bsd.port.mk, so > users will have to upgrade their ports-base collection from time to > time, to ensure they will all have a reasonably new bsd.port.mk. What > do you guys think? Isn't this already accomplished by the PORTMKVERSION variable (Which really shouldn't be limited to forcing people to use "upgrade packages" IMO) ? -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000502075905.E392>