Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:30:56 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns/c-ares Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/dns/c-ares/files ares-config-info.patch patch-Makefile.in Message-ID: <20100329083056.GA93874@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20100329074634.GA1315@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <201003221056.o2MAu4D5001930@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100326192300.25171ab9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20100329074634.GA1315@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46:34AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: >=20 > Am I wrong in assuming that any automatically-built packages would > have BATCH and/or PACKAGE_BUILDING defined at build time, and that That's an "and". http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/Tools/portbuild/scri= pts/buildenv?rev=3D1.29;content-type=3Dtext%2Fplain Cheers, -erwin > the code in bsd.port(.pre).mk would use the default value for all > options in that case? Or is there some defined symbol - or some other > combination of symbols - that would result in WITH_HIDE_SYMBOLS > *not* being defined, even though the option's default is "yes"? >=20 > Of course, I could be missing something, in which case I'd be thankful > for a correction in my worldview :) >=20 > G'luck, > Peter >=20 > --=20 > Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org > PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc > Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 > If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been parad= oxical. --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLsGU/qy9aWxUlaZARAiZBAKCCPbI2Ndk9vwck1Dw6o2WYMuE0BwCg1bba FpbgeWUp28uj52A4IwSH9bw= =g+be -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100329083056.GA93874>