Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Jan 2003 06:04:10 +0900 (JST)
From:      Hideyuki KURASHINA <rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp>
To:        hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: relnotes, jumbo(9) man-ref lacked in zero_copy(9) paragraph?
Message-ID:  <20030103.060410.21919073.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20030103.032921.39148074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
References:  <20030103.013712.74568050.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp> <20030103.032921.39148074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>>> On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 03:29:21 +0900 (JST), Hiroki Sato <hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> said:

> Hi,
> 
> Hideyuki KURASHINA <rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp> wrote
>   in <20030103.013712.74568050.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp>:
> 
> rushani> Following patch correct for zero_copy(9) paragraph in relnotes?
> 
>  I do not think so.  jumbo(9) describes the jumbo allocator
>  implemented in FreeBSD 5.0, and it does not directly mean
>  jumbo frames themselves on Gigabit Ethernet.

Thanks for clarification.

>  The two have much relevance to each other, but using such
>  kinds of reference will confuse the readers, I think.

I agree your opinion.

Thanks again.

-- rushani

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030103.060410.21919073.rushani>