Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 09:04:16 +0000 From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk on freefall Message-ID: <199612260900.JAA13643@veda.is> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Dec 1996 22:47:42 PST." <199612260647.WAA05315@baloon.mimi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * > * freefall still has bsd.port.mk from 4.Dec, while thud has it from 17= > * =2EDec. > > Please fix your mailing program, this "=" business is ugly and hard to > read! ;) My copy back from the mailing list did not have any quoted-printable rubbish in it, and yours only has it where your editor inserts its own line-break. Therefore it must be happening at your end. Oh, you are asking me to shorten my lines. ;) > * minimum differences should exist between 2.2 and 3.0-current(2.2-release-= > > freefall doesn't run 2.2. > > Satoshi I think the same applies for 2.1.x as 2.2, right? As I understand it, bsd.port.mk is a key component of the ports system, and whereas ports cannot be guaranteed to build under a less than current system, it is reasonable to allow ports to build where other changes to the system do not prevent it. Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612260900.JAA13643>