Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 09:58:53 -0700 From: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: r256920 missing in stable/9 and releng/9.3 Message-ID: <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de> References: <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com> <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+ freebsd-net@, On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > Bez=C3=BCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtime)= : >> Hi, >> >> I=E2=80=99m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving ou= r local patches to 9.2 forward. >> >> I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been M= FC=E2=80=99d. It was listed as =E2=80=9CMFC after 3 days=E2=80=9D back in O= ctober 2013. >> >> Is this patch missing for a reason? > > I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC? I also don't see any obvious reason. If nobody objects on -net@, I can do it. cheers, Hiren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA>