Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:57:49 +0700 From: John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is -CURRENT in bad shape? Message-ID: <20010212135748.A9535@office.naver.co.id> In-Reply-To: <20010211223956.X3274@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:39:56PM -0800 References: <20010212132036.A58094@office.naver.co.id> <20010211223956.X3274@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:39:56PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >Current from Sat Feb 10 17:00:18 looks ok, there were just some >patches to the scheduler but no one has complained yet. Let us >know. :) Thanks for the fast reply. I really need it. OK... buildworld seems to be running ok right now. I'll let you know if something goes wrong, of course... ;) BTW, today I saw post from John Baldwin to remove device random from the kernel config. Then, other post replied that this is a good thing, mpg123 playing went a lot better for him, well at least, that's what he said. If this is so, then why is there a device random line in GENERIC kernel? Do we really need device random? Thanks... >-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] /john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010212135748.A9535>