Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:22:30 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys kernel.h eventhandler.h src/sys/kern Message-ID: <20001213122230.J15912@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <200012122109.QAA53213@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:09:16PM -0500 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012121301400.26829-100000@zeppo.feral.com> <52595.976655244@critter> <200012122109.QAA53213@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20001212 22:15], Garrett Wollman (wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) wrote: ><<On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:07:24 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> said: > >> I did, and they were unneeded at the time (or current would have been >> broken since Oct 29th.) > >``unneeded'' != ``compiles OK without the header''. > >There are many instances of the latter which result from brokenness in >the headers. But that's mainly due to the include files being kitchen sink includes nowadays. =\ It is often hard to discern how the files interact when you have a lit of includes, which include others, but still allow the program to compile and link ok when you remove one include due to include file including others. I wonder if there is ever a good solution to this issue. I welcome any insight into this. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best Network- and systemadministrator D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 And the question is why..? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001213122230.J15912>