Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:28:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inetd not-starting gotcha. Message-ID: <200204191828.g3JISOhR001824@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <20020419111713.Y10371-100000@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(CC'd to -stable again, so the people in question can see the praise. :-) Mike Hoskins wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Frank Mayhar wrote: > > This change _did_ deserve a heads-up, at least to -stable. Sigh. > Wow, commiters are human too? :) _Believe_ me, I'm not slamming Doug. I more than appreciate the efforts of all the committers over the years. If it weren't for them, I probably wouldn't be able to run this stuff, and in particular have it be so reliable. I'm just a tiny bit annoyed that the change wasn't specifically mentioned, and more than a tiny bit annoyed at Eric's implication that missing it was entirely my fault. Of course, when _I_ ran into the problem, I just tracked it down, fixed it and never thought any more about it. As you say, -stable is _so_ stable that it's a real shock when something like this happens. That says a lot about the developers, all of it good. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204191828.g3JISOhR001824>