Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 08:53:10 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Administrivia: charter clarification question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912040851270.27711-100000@beppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <199912041637.CAA03403@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Really? Well, perhaps it's *my* fault... but I would have thought -scsi issues should be in -scsi. The tape driver issues were specific to -scsi. I suppose -current would have been okay, but due to volume I probably would have missed it. So, if my feedback is important in the discussion, it's better to have this in -scsi where I pay more attention. :-) On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Stephen McKay wrote: > In response to my recent thread "Tape driver problems" I was advised twice > by a respectable FreeBSD citizen that my posting was misfiled and should > have gone to -current. Quote: > > "If it's -CURRENT, talk about it on -CURRENT. That overrides anything else." > > It is my belief that scsi stuff should be discussed on -scsi no matter > whether it is -current, -stable, or some older release. Am I wrong? > The charter as it stands is rather thin: > > >>>> info freebsd-scsi > FREEBSD-SCSI SCSI subsystem > This is the mailing list for people working on the scsi subsystem > for FreeBSD. > > Please note that this is not a whinge, I am not after ammunition for an > "I told you so", and I'm not going to say who contacted me. I just want > the system to work smoothly. > > Stephen. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912040851270.27711-100000>