Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:10:03 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Some packages are missing from 7-current/i386?
Message-ID:  <20070603181003.GA11709@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070603174622.GB15967@rambler-co.ru>
References:  <20070603140105.GA54464@rambler-co.ru> <20070603170353.GA10732@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070603174622.GB15967@rambler-co.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:46:22PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi Kris,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:03:53PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:01:05PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > 
> > > Anyone knows why the latest packages for 7-current/i386
> > > 
> > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-current/All/
> > > 
> > > miss the xorg-7.2 package and some others, while according
> > > to pointyhat logs there were no errors.
> > 
> > Actually xorg-7.2 did not build last time, because many of the
> > applications had plist errors.  Hopefully these have now been fixed.
> > 
> Do you mean that i386 packages were built before, and
> amd64's after these errors have been fixed?  Or amd64
> was built before they were introduced?  ;)

This was a recent regression.  7.0 formerly built on i386 and amd64,
but i386 was the only one rebuilt after the change.  Normally I would
not upload the package set when something like this takes out a bunch
of important ports but I guess I forgot this time - sorry.

> And one more question.  Where on http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/
> I can see that the xorg's build was broken last time?
> I seem to have checked the error logs from the last
> full and current builds, but didn't find anything
> relevant, hence my email.  Thanks!

http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-7-latest/

shows a number of ports that prevent large numbers of other ports
(565) from being built - these are the X applications in question.

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070603181003.GA11709>