Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:49:41 +0900 From: Shigeyuki Fukushima (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSiFFZ0xQRzcbKEI=?=) <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Message-ID: <20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp@mta1.odn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <200009050109.e8519VG20062@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> References: <200009050109.e8519VG20062@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: kiri@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp Subject: Re: bsd.ruby.mk, bsd.gnome.mk, ... etc. Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 10:09:31 +0900 > At Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:24:10 +0100 (CET), > Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrote: > > I think that bsd.emacs.mk does not need to rename. :) Is this right? ;) > But according to scheme of inclusion bsd.*.mk files by > category_name, it takes to rename whether elisp to emacs or > bsd.emacs.mk to bsd.elisp.mk. > # I think it better to the former. If we take bsd.<defined-category-name>.mk policy, shall we rename category from "elisp" to "emacs"? --- shige To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000907134953790.EFSE.880.t-mta1.odn.ne.jp>