Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:55:03 -0800 (PST) From: "W. Reilly Cooley" <wcooley@nakedape.navi.net> To: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com> Cc: Benoit Rossier <Benoit.Rossier@mcnet.ch>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW performance impact? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9903302352470.27147-100000@rheingold> In-Reply-To: <199903310725.BAA00629@home.dragondata.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > Right now, i've got close to 2MB out, and 1MB in, with two fxp0 cards, > and a pretty heavy ruleset (40 rules, that most packets have to pass > through all of them). > > last pid: 26211; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > 13 processes: 1 running, 12 sleeping > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 6.6% interrupt, 93.4% idle > > > This is on a P/200. How much traffic do you have going through at the time you posted this? This data would be more meaningful if, say, you we're doing an FTP or dump to a machine just on the other side, so you had lots of traffic. If it's idle, then it doesn't really matter how many rules or how much you've got--it'd be as idle on a 386-16. Wil -- W. Reilly Cooley wcooley@nakedape.navi.net Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.navi.net Internet Meta-Resources: http://nakedape.navi.net/meta-res/ "All the Net you need to be a geek" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9903302352470.27147-100000>