Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:39:59 +0200
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc:        usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ?
Message-ID:  <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:19 +0200
> > >
> > > Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote:
> > > > There was a discussion back in september about adding
> > > > support for basic CDC tty devices in umodem.c.
> > > > This lets you talk to a number of usb devices built around
> > > > microcontrollers (e.g. Atmel), and puts us on par with
> > > > Linux and Windows in terms of supporting these devices.
> > > >
> > > > Because this simply requires the small patch below to the
> > > > probe/attach routine, so if there are no objections I plan to add
> > > > this to the system (CURRENT then RELENG_7 and RELENG_6) in the next
> > > > few days.
> 
> What about flow control? Is flow control required for these devices?

the ones I am talking about don't implement any form of flow control.
I suppose they would otherwise match the previous check.

luigi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080704213959.GA1706>