Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:04:35 -0700 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap Message-ID: <42F63113.5020600@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050807.100211.20316746.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20050807.153425.21897310.hrs@allbsd.org> <42F5BC19.5040602@freebsd.org> <20050807.211240.75793221.hrs@allbsd.org> <20050807.100211.20316746.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > However, one possible gotcha in setting this up is licensing. Do you > know that your distribution of binary snapshot complies with the GPL > which requires that you also provide the sources when you do this? > The project already has some issues with GPLd ports when it builds > binaries. Are distfiles part of portsnap? If so, then you are safe > for the standard licenses... Huh? Isn't the ports tree BSD-licensed? Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F63113.5020600>