Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:29:48 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> To: Chris Hill <chris@monochrome.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jacques Henry <caramba696@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: NTP Client synchronization with a Windows 2003/2008 Message-ID: <d36406630910150129j7f46681awb622ec69c90d3047@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0910141852140.5763@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <2345d18f0910130813j6a2bbde0sec59647f44d43585@mail.gmail.com> <2345d18f0910130921g17b8d9fdy8fdb99bd5a0e8cf4@mail.gmail.com> <4AD4AE89.6010802@radel.com> <200910140902.27825.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <2345d18f0910140904v3e2e9f37hbaabc05cb561a19d@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0910141852140.5763@tripel.monochrome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/10/15 Chris Hill <chris@monochrome.org> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Jacques Henry wrote: > > The 19 minutes between when I sent my suggestions and you responded is >>>> hardly enough time to see if ntpd was slewing the time. Slewing 587 >>>> seconds takes days. >>>> >>> >>> >> The thing is that ntpd is not slewing the time at all, even after several >> hours!! >> > > If I may pipe up... Can you not set the clock manually, then let ntpd take > it from there? Seems like your clock would become synced a lot faster if it > started out "close". Sorry if I'm being naive, but this seemed like the > obvious thing to do. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > sometimes the crude and simple methods are the best 8)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d36406630910150129j7f46681awb622ec69c90d3047>