Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:34:12 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.orG> To: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libatm Makefile atm_addr.c cache_key.c ioctl_subr.c ip_addr.c ip_checksum.c libatm.h timer.c src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile ... Message-ID: <20080525233132.B36357@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <4839E7A8.5050205@FreeBSD.org> References: <200805252211.m4PMBgEU052231@repoman.freebsd.org> <4839E7A8.5050205@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 25 May 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Note that __netnatm__ is still alive and kicking and should be for some time > to come. Folk who are using ADSL modems natively with ppp(8) will continue > to need it. Yup, I have no negative plans for netnatm in mind -- I actually did the basic locking work for it a few years ago, although was never able to test it properly due to lack of ATM test hardware. netatm was a sufficiently complicated subsystem as to make that impossible. If you have any bug reports regarding locking and netnatm, I'm happy to field them. I put a basic subsystem lock around netnatm, but you could imagine something more granular if performance results suggested that would be useful. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080525233132.B36357>