Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:26:17 -0700 From: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SILICONE TUBING, BRAIDED HOSES, GASKETS,SHEETS Message-ID: <54B33ED9.9090502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54B33CAB.6070608@radel.com> References: <mailman.67.1420891201.78916.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <BLU437-SMTP83FDCC6EBEFC81E5193F85F6450@phx.gbl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1501101938520.18671@tripel.monochrome.org> <47145.69.209.239.168.1420939332.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20150112110955.7f55a0a1@X220.alogt.com> <54B33CAB.6070608@radel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/11/2015 08:16 PM, Jon Radel wrote: > On 1/11/15 10:09 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:22:12 -0600 (CST) >> "Valeri Galtsev" <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, January 10, 2015 6:40 pm, Chris Hill wrote: >>>> Any of us who are homebrewers might well be interested in food-grade >>>> autoclavable tubing. >>>> >>> And I was suggesting to reject from domain... Forget it, there is no >>> way to please everybody if spam lovers are in the mix... >>> >> did you notice that the same spam also came from >> himsanpolymer@gmail.com? >> >> Should I go through my spam to find out more of those addresses? >> > I recognize the irony of this email so will do this only once this year: > > I personally find the endless discussions about spam vastly more > tedious than the actual spam, of which there is relatively little. If > nothing else, the discussion is more likely to look to my spam filter > as if it might have some worthwhile content. > > Happy New Year! > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > All I wish to add to all this noise is this: I send an email to the provider of the email address the message came from and to the host hosting the domain and a cc the DHS about this abuse.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B33ED9.9090502>